{"id":1339,"date":"2021-01-26T20:14:13","date_gmt":"2021-01-27T01:14:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nationalimmigrationlawyers.com\/2021\/01\/26\/dhs-and-states-sign-safe-agreement-that-could-obstruct-bidens-upcoming-immigration-policies\/"},"modified":"2021-01-26T20:14:13","modified_gmt":"2021-01-27T01:14:13","slug":"dhs-and-states-sign-safe-agreement-that-could-obstruct-bidens-upcoming-immigration-policies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nationalimmigrationlawyers.com\/2021\/01\/26\/dhs-and-states-sign-safe-agreement-that-could-obstruct-bidens-upcoming-immigration-policies\/","title":{"rendered":"DHS and States Sign SAFE Agreement That Could Obstruct Biden\u2019s Upcoming Immigration Policies"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\"U.S.<\/figure>\n

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS)<\/a> has signed agreements with many states that will pose a threat to the Biden administration\u2019s goals. The DHS has signed the Sanctuary for Americans First Enactment Agreement (SAFE) with Arizona, Louisiana, Indiana, and the Rockingham County Sheriff\u2019s Office in North Carolina<\/a>. This SAFE agreement could seriously hamstring the administration\u2019s goals of pausing deportations, prioritizing immigration arrests to immigrants with serious criminal backgrounds, and increasing avenues to asylum.<\/p>\n

The Sanctuary for Americans First Enactment Agreement<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Under the SAFE agreements, the DHS would give notice of immigration policy changes and the states would have six months to review them and submit comments. Only after this review can the DHS move forward with the proposed changes. The DHS would require the states to sign agreements confirming that the DHS provided the required notice.<\/p>\n

\u201cDHS recognizes that Agency, like other state agencies and municipalities, is directly and concretely affected by changes to DHS rules and policies that have the effect of easing, relaxing, or limiting immigration enforcement,\u201d notes the agreement with Arizona. \u201cSuch changes can negatively impact Agency\u2019s law enforcement needs and budgets, as well as its other important health, safety, and pecuniary interests of the State of Arizona.\u201d<\/p>\n

The agreement states that the DHS will \u201cprioritize the protection of the United States\u201d by enforcing immigration laws in a way that prioritizes detention and results in arrests of \u201cremovable aliens.\u201d Further, the DHS will provide \u201can opportunity to consult and comment on the proposed action, before taking any such action listed above.\u201d The agreement provides injunctive relief whereby if either of the parties refuses to comply with the agreement, the State can request termination of the agreement with 180 days of notice.<\/p>\n

Reactions to the SAFE Agreement<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Sarah Pierce, a policy analyst at the Migration Policy Institute<\/a>, told BuzzFeed<\/em> News<\/em><\/a> \u201cIn its final days, the Trump administration is staying true to its strategy of trying anything and everything to implement its restrictive immigration agenda and give it staying power after their time in office.\u201d<\/p>\n

Lt. Kevin Suthard, a spokesperson for the Rockingham County Sheriff\u2019s Office signed the agreement last year. \u201cIt\u2019s not political, it\u2019s about public safety. Doing all that we can to keep the residents of Rockingham County that we serve safe,\u201d he said in an email to BuzzFeed News<\/em>. \u201cThat it is always our number one priority.\u201d<\/p>\n

Immigration Law Professor of Santa Clara University School of Law<\/a>, Pratheepan Gulasekaram, said the agreement is a mechanism for the states to potentially sue the administration over the changing policies in federal court. \u201cThis is just another last-ditch effort to try and ingrain a reckless hyper enforcement system, but completely unmoored from legal, constitutional ways of implementing policy,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Senior advocate and policy counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union<\/a>, Naureen Shah, called the agreements \u201ca transparent attempt by Trump officials to tie the Biden-Harris administration\u2019s hands and preserve Trump\u2019s grotesque immigration enforcement policy.\u201d<\/p>\n

Acting DHS Secretary Chad Wolf, who resigned in the last week of December, said that \u201cUnfortunately, this action is warranted by recent events, including the ongoing and meritless court rulings regarding the validity of my authority as Acting Secretary.\u201d Many policies that Wolf issued while in office were challenged in court, as attorneys argued the legality of his appointment to his role. In many cases, the federal judges noted that Wolf was not lawfully appointed, thereby blocking the DHS policies for that reason.<\/p>\n

It remains unsure what effects these agreements will\u00a0have once the Biden administration starts rolling out its immigration reforms.<\/p>\n

To learn more about this blog post or if you have any other immigration concerns<\/a>, please feel free to contact me at\u00a0rglahoud@norris-law.com<\/a>\u00a0or (484) 544-0022.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n